Cynthia Kagiwada no longer desires to be Katherine Kealoha’s court-appointed defense legal professional because of moral worries. Kagiwada filed a series of motions Tuesday wherein she asked U.S. District Court Judge J. Michael Seabright if she ought to withdraw as Kealoha’s attorney in three separate crook instances related to allegations of conspiracy, obstruction, financial institution fraud, and drug trafficking.
Kealoha changed into found guilty last week at the side of her husband, retired Honolulu police chief Louis Kealoha, of framing her uncle, Gerard Puana, for the theft of her mailbox in 2013. Two Honolulu law enforcement officials, Derek Hahn and Minh-Hung “Bobby” Nguyen were also convicted. Kagiwada’s motions said there “seems to be an irretrievable breakdown within the legal professional-customer relationship, which cannot be reconciled.”
She additionally stated some of the ethical issues ruled by the Hawaii Rules of Professional Conduct, which all attorneys ought to abide by to remain inaccurate standing. Specifically, she pointed to a few guidelines, including one that stated a lawyer could drop a customer if that client “insists upon taking motion that the lawyer considers repugnant or with which the lawyer has a fundamental war of words.”
Kagiwada additionally referred to provisions associated with instances wherein a client “fails extensively to satisfy a duty to the legal professional concerning the lawyer’s offerings” and “different top purpose.” Kagiwada did now not offer any details in her motion approximately her disagreements with Kealoha, who’s a former metropolis prosecutor. Kagiwada additionally did no longer reply to a Civil Beat request for remark. The friction between Kagiwada and Kealoha has become obtrusive in ultimate month’s criminal trial.
Kealoha and her own family hired an outside legal professional, Earle Partington, to sign up for the case mid-trial, at the same day federal prosecutors finished presenting maximum in their proof. Partington had said his fundamental position inside the case changed into preparing Kealoha’s civil lawyer, Kevin Sumida, for the witness stand. Partington is known as Sumida to testify approximately his role in a lawsuit filed in opposition to Kealoha by her uncle and grandmother, Florence Puana.
Sumida may additionally have, in the end, induced extra harm than right. Not best did he conflict while grilled with the aid of prosecutors on go-examination; they say he was additionally caught mendacity. Partington informed Civil Beat on Tuesday that he changed into amazed through Kagiwada’s motion and did now not understand what her particular worries have been in regards to representing Kealoha.
“I knew not anything approximately it, and I don’t believe Kat knew something approximately it both,” Partington said of Kagiwada’s movement. “(Kagiwada) turned into very sad after I got here into the case and made her feelings recognized by way of refusing to cooperate with me commonly.
Attorney Cites Ethical Concerns In Motion To Drop Katherine Kealoha As Client
Cynthia Kagiwada no longer desires to be Katherine Kealoha’s court-appointed defense legal professional because of moral worries. Kagiwada filed a series of motions Tuesday wherein she asked U.S. District Court Judge J. Michael Seabright if she ought to withdraw as Kealoha’s attorney in three separate crook instances related to allegations of conspiracy, obstruction, financial institution fraud, and drug trafficking.
Kealoha changed into found guilty last week at the side of her husband, retired Honolulu police chief Louis Kealoha, of framing her uncle, Gerard Puana, for the theft of her mailbox in 2013. Two Honolulu law enforcement officials, Derek Hahn and Minh-Hung “Bobby” Nguyen were also convicted. Kagiwada’s motions said there “seems to be an irretrievable breakdown within the legal professional-customer relationship, which cannot be reconciled.”
She additionally stated some of the ethical issues ruled by the Hawaii Rules of Professional Conduct, which all attorneys ought to abide by to remain inaccurate standing. Specifically, she pointed to a few guidelines, including one that stated a lawyer could drop a customer if that client “insists upon taking motion that the lawyer considers repugnant or with which the lawyer has a fundamental war of words.”
Kagiwada additionally referred to provisions associated with instances wherein a client “fails extensively to satisfy a duty to the legal professional concerning the lawyer’s offerings” and “different top purpose.” Kagiwada did now not offer any details in her motion approximately her disagreements with Kealoha, who’s a former metropolis prosecutor. Kagiwada additionally did no longer reply to a Civil Beat request for remark.
The friction between Kagiwada and Kealoha has become obtrusive in ultimate month’s criminal trial. Kealoha and her own family hired an outside legal professional, Earle Partington, to sign up for the case mid-trial, at the same day federal prosecutors finished presenting maximum in their proof. Partington had said his fundamental position inside the case changed into preparing Kealoha’s civil lawyer, Kevin Sumida, for the witness stand. Partington is known as Sumida to testify approximately his role in a lawsuit filed in opposition to Kealoha by her uncle and grandmother, Florence Puana.
Sumida may additionally have, in the end, induced extra harm than right. Not best did he conflict while grilled with the aid of prosecutors on go-examination; they say he was additionally caught mendacity. Partington informed Civil Beat on Tuesday that he changed into amazed through Kagiwada’s motion and did now not understand what her particular worries have been in regards to representing Kealoha. “I knew not anything approximately it, and I don’t believe Kat knew something approximately it both,” Partington said of Kagiwada’s movement. “(Kagiwada) turned into very sad after I got here into the case and made her feelings recognized by way of refusing to cooperate with me commonly.
